Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

All Codon benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Thu May 04 2023, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][2 cores] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8272CL CPU @ 2.60GHz (Model 85)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1.py 4.7ms 0.4ms 7.0MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.16.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1.py 2018ms 2.1ms 7.3MB 2000ms 0ms codon 0.16.0

Input: 500000

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1.py 209ms 1.2ms 5.7MB 197ms 0ms codon 0.16.0

nsieve

Input: 12

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1.py 1189ms 34ms 46.8MB 1167ms 10ms codon 0.16.0
2.py 1572ms 33ms 108.9MB 1533ms 23ms codon 0.16.0

Input: 10

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1.py 156ms 0.3ms 17.0MB 140ms 3ms codon 0.16.0
2.py 244ms 2.2ms 27.9MB 227ms 3ms codon 0.16.0