Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

All Codon benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Mon Apr 14 2025, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1-m.py 11ms 0.4ms 8.5MB 20ms 0ms codon 0.18.2

nbody

Input: 5000000

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1.py 1325ms 8.3ms 8.9MB 1637ms 0ms codon 0.18.2

Input: 500000

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1-m.py 186ms 16ms 8.8MB 493ms 0ms codon 0.18.2

nsieve

Input: 12

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1-m.py 439ms 1.9ms 47.6MB 740ms 3ms codon 0.18.2
2.py 1566ms 35ms 100.8MB 1870ms 27ms codon 0.18.2

Input: 10

code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
1-m.py 127ms 2.2ms 18.3MB 430ms 0ms codon 0.18.2
2-m.py 396ms 4.4ms 27.2MB 707ms 3ms codon 0.18.2