Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

Codon VS Javascript benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sun Jan 29 2023, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][2 cores] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8370C CPU @ 2.80GHz (Model 106)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 4.1ms 0.8ms 5.3MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.15.4
javascript 1.js 15ms 1.1ms 55.5MB 0ms 0ms bun 0.5.1
javascript 1.js 43ms 0.7ms 43.1MB 30ms 2ms node 19.5.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
javascript 6.js 603ms 4.1ms 47.2MB 590ms 7ms node 19.5.0
javascript 6.js 1010ms 1.0ms 63.9MB 1000ms 7ms bun 0.5.1
codon 1.py 1947ms 23ms 5.3MB 1933ms 0ms codon 0.15.4

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
javascript 6.js 106ms 3.3ms 47.3MB 97ms 3ms node 19.5.0
javascript 6.js 122ms 2.4ms 70.0MB 120ms 3ms bun 0.5.1
codon 1.py 197ms 0.8ms 5.3MB 187ms 0ms codon 0.15.4

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 873ms 79ms 48.3MB 850ms 3ms codon 0.15.4
codon 2.py 1003ms 24ms 106.7MB 977ms 13ms codon 0.15.4

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 150ms 0.2ms 15.1MB 133ms 3ms codon 0.15.4
codon 2.py 185ms 3.8ms 23.9MB 173ms 3ms codon 0.15.4