Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

Codon VS Javascript benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sun Jul 13 2025, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1-m.py 11ms 1.0ms 8.6MB 22ms 0ms codon 0.19.0
javascript 1.js 12ms 0.4ms 31.6MB 0ms 0ms bun 1.2.18
javascript 1.js 31ms 0.6ms 50.8MB 16ms 6ms node 24.4.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
javascript 6.js 455ms 2.0ms 58.8MB 447ms 3ms node 24.4.0
javascript 6.js 607ms 14ms 44.8MB 610ms 0ms bun 1.2.18
codon 1.py 1318ms 1.0ms 9.4MB 1627ms 0ms codon 0.19.0

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
javascript 6.js 79ms 3.2ms 58.9MB 67ms 10ms node 24.4.0
javascript 6.js 80ms 1.8ms 44.9MB 83ms 7ms bun 1.2.18
codon 1-m.py 176ms 3.2ms 9.4MB 487ms 0ms codon 0.19.0

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1-m.py 410ms 9.1ms 48.4MB 713ms 3ms codon 0.19.0
codon 2.py 903ms 4.6ms 100.8MB 1207ms 20ms codon 0.19.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1-m.py 118ms 3.1ms 18.9MB 423ms 0ms codon 0.19.0
codon 2-m.py 236ms 3.0ms 27.6MB 540ms 3ms codon 0.19.0