Codon VS Crystal benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sat Nov 16 2024, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 1.cr 2.2ms 0.2ms 3.1MB 0ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
codon 1.py 4.6ms 0.6ms 7.4MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 2.cr 342ms 2.6ms 3.4MB 327ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
crystal 1.cr 344ms 2.9ms 3.4MB 333ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
codon 1.py 1302ms 15ms 7.9MB 1287ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 1.cr 38ms 0.2ms 3.4MB 27ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
crystal 2.cr 39ms 0.3ms 3.4MB 30ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
codon 1.py 136ms 1.4ms 7.9MB 130ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 2.cr 351ms 1.7ms 8.4MB 340ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
crystal 1.cr 373ms 4.3ms 43.0MB 357ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
codon 1.py 374ms 2.0ms 46.6MB 357ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
codon 2.py 856ms 4.9ms 99.8MB 833ms 20ms codon 0.17.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 73ms 2.7ms 17.3MB 60ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
crystal 1.cr 79ms 1.1ms 13.3MB 70ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
crystal 2.cr 87ms 1.7ms 4.6MB 80ms 0ms crystal 1.14.0
codon 2.py 197ms 1.6ms 25.6MB 187ms 3ms codon 0.17.0