Codon VS Crystal benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Thu Feb 01 2024, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 1.cr 2.2ms 0.2ms 3.1MB 0ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
codon 1.py 4.5ms 0.8ms 7.2MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.16.3

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 1.cr 342ms 0.8ms 3.5MB 330ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
crystal 2.cr 348ms 10ms 3.5MB 337ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
codon 1.py 1295ms 1.9ms 7.7MB 1287ms 0ms codon 0.16.3

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 2.cr 37ms 0.5ms 3.5MB 27ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
crystal 1.cr 39ms 1.2ms 3.6MB 30ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
codon 1.py 140ms 2.4ms 5.8MB 127ms 0ms codon 0.16.3

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 1.cr 380ms 2.1ms 42.7MB 363ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
crystal 2.cr 381ms 2.1ms 8.4MB 370ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
codon 1.py 406ms 0.9ms 46.5MB 390ms 0ms codon 0.16.3
codon 2.py 482ms 8.3ms 107.0MB 463ms 13ms codon 0.16.3

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 1.cr 80ms 1.2ms 13.3MB 70ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
codon 1.py 81ms 2.0ms 17.2MB 70ms 0ms codon 0.16.3
crystal 2.cr 93ms 0.9ms 4.8MB 80ms 0ms crystal 1.11.2
codon 2.py 110ms 3.4ms 26.0MB 97ms 3ms codon 0.16.3