Codon VS OCaml benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Mon Jun 23 2025, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 1.8ms 0.2ms 5.0MB 0ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 1-m.py 12ms 0.9ms 8.8MB 20ms 0ms codon 0.18.2

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 373ms 1.9ms 5.2MB 360ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 1.py 1453ms 224ms 8.8MB 1763ms 0ms codon 0.18.2

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 41ms 1.4ms 5.2MB 30ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 1-m.py 175ms 4.0ms 8.8MB 483ms 0ms codon 0.18.2

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1-m.py 502ms 15ms 47.7MB 803ms 3ms codon 0.18.2
ocaml 1.ml 957ms 3.4ms 550.3MB 900ms 43ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 2.py 1569ms 7.2ms 101.0MB 1877ms 20ms codon 0.18.2
ocaml 2.ml 1886ms 14ms 18.9MB 1873ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1-m.py 128ms 2.1ms 18.7MB 437ms 0ms codon 0.18.2
ocaml 1.ml 191ms 3.0ms 141.6MB 170ms 10ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 2-m.py 398ms 6.2ms 27.1MB 710ms 7ms codon 0.18.2
ocaml 2.ml 471ms 4.3ms 9.1MB 460ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0