Codon VS OCaml benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Thu Feb 01 2024, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 1.7ms 0.1ms 3.0MB 0ms 0ms ocaml 5.1.1
codon 1.py 4.5ms 0.8ms 7.2MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.16.3

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 373ms 3.1ms 3.3MB 360ms 0ms ocaml 5.1.1
codon 1.py 1295ms 1.9ms 7.7MB 1287ms 0ms codon 0.16.3

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 40ms 0.9ms 3.3MB 30ms 0ms ocaml 5.1.1
codon 1.py 140ms 2.4ms 5.8MB 127ms 0ms codon 0.16.3

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 406ms 0.9ms 46.5MB 390ms 0ms codon 0.16.3
codon 2.py 482ms 8.3ms 107.0MB 463ms 13ms codon 0.16.3
ocaml 1.ml 989ms 6.1ms 550.4MB 923ms 50ms ocaml 5.1.1
ocaml 2.ml 2043ms 6.1ms 18.5MB 2030ms 0ms ocaml 5.1.1

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 81ms 2.0ms 17.2MB 70ms 0ms codon 0.16.3
codon 2.py 110ms 3.4ms 26.0MB 97ms 3ms codon 0.16.3
ocaml 1.ml 212ms 19ms 139.7MB 190ms 7ms ocaml 5.1.1
ocaml 2.ml 502ms 3.3ms 9.0MB 487ms 0ms ocaml 5.1.1