Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

Codon VS OCaml benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Thu Jul 13 2023, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][2 cores] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8370C CPU @ 2.80GHz (Model 106)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 2.7ms 0.6ms 3.1MB 0ms 0ms ocaml 5.0.0
codon 1.py 4.0ms 0.6ms 5.1MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.16.2

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 470ms 0.5ms 2.9MB 460ms 0ms ocaml 5.0.0
codon 1.py 1947ms 41ms 7.2MB 1933ms 0ms codon 0.16.2

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 50ms 0.6ms 2.9MB 40ms 0ms ocaml 5.0.0
codon 1.py 198ms 2.4ms 7.3MB 190ms 0ms codon 0.16.2

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 682ms 64ms 44.5MB 657ms 10ms codon 0.16.2
codon 2.py 911ms 35ms 104.9MB 883ms 13ms codon 0.16.2
ocaml 1.ml 1999ms 32ms 550.5MB 1893ms 87ms ocaml 5.0.0
ocaml 2.ml 2424ms 16ms 19.0MB 2410ms 0ms ocaml 5.0.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 150ms 1.1ms 15.1MB 140ms 0ms codon 0.16.2
codon 2.py 202ms 0.9ms 25.6MB 183ms 7ms codon 0.16.2
ocaml 1.ml 339ms 11ms 140.3MB 307ms 17ms ocaml 5.0.0
ocaml 2.ml 609ms 28ms 9.1MB 590ms 0ms ocaml 5.0.0