Codon VS OCaml benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sat Nov 16 2024, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 1.8ms 0.1ms 5.0MB 0ms 0ms ocaml 5.2.0
codon 1.py 4.6ms 0.6ms 7.4MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 372ms 3.2ms 5.3MB 363ms 0ms ocaml 5.2.0
codon 1.py 1302ms 15ms 7.9MB 1287ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 40ms 0.1ms 5.3MB 30ms 0ms ocaml 5.2.0
codon 1.py 136ms 1.4ms 7.9MB 130ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 374ms 2.0ms 46.6MB 357ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
codon 2.py 856ms 4.9ms 99.8MB 833ms 20ms codon 0.17.0
ocaml 1.ml 975ms 2.8ms 552.4MB 910ms 50ms ocaml 5.2.0
ocaml 2.ml 1932ms 30ms 17.2MB 1920ms 0ms ocaml 5.2.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 73ms 2.7ms 17.3MB 60ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
ocaml 1.ml 193ms 2.0ms 142.3MB 170ms 10ms ocaml 5.2.0
codon 2.py 197ms 1.6ms 25.6MB 187ms 3ms codon 0.17.0
ocaml 2.ml 478ms 6.0ms 9.1MB 463ms 0ms ocaml 5.2.0