Codon VS Odin benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sat Nov 16 2024, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 1.2ms 0.1ms 1.6MB 0ms 0ms odin 2024
codon 1.py 4.6ms 0.6ms 7.4MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 353ms 1.7ms 1.5MB 340ms 0ms odin 2024
odin 1-i.odin 355ms 1.2ms 1.5MB 340ms 0ms odin 2024
codon 1.py 1302ms 15ms 7.9MB 1287ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 37ms 0.5ms 1.5MB 27ms 0ms odin 2024
odin 1-i.odin 38ms 0.6ms 1.5MB 30ms 0ms odin 2024
codon 1.py 136ms 1.4ms 7.9MB 130ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 283ms 4.5ms 40.6MB 263ms 3ms odin 2024
codon 1.py 374ms 2.0ms 46.6MB 357ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
odin 2.odin 744ms 10ms 6.5MB 733ms 3ms odin 2024
codon 2.py 856ms 4.9ms 99.8MB 833ms 20ms codon 0.17.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 59ms 0.9ms 11.4MB 50ms 0ms odin 2024
codon 1.py 73ms 2.7ms 17.3MB 60ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
odin 2.odin 177ms 11ms 2.8MB 167ms 0ms odin 2024
codon 2.py 197ms 1.6ms 25.6MB 187ms 3ms codon 0.17.0