Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

Codon VS Odin benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Thu Jul 13 2023, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][2 cores] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8370C CPU @ 2.80GHz (Model 106)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 2.0ms 0.7ms 1.2MB 0ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 4.0ms 0.6ms 5.1MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.16.2

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1-i.odin 508ms 0.6ms 1.3MB 500ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 1947ms 41ms 7.2MB 1933ms 0ms codon 0.16.2
odin 1.odin 2903ms 22ms 1.2MB 2890ms 0ms odin 2023

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1-i.odin 54ms 0.4ms 1.2MB 43ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 198ms 2.4ms 7.3MB 190ms 0ms codon 0.16.2
odin 1.odin 296ms 10ms 1.2MB 287ms 0ms odin 2023

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 587ms 13ms 40.6MB 570ms 3ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 682ms 64ms 44.5MB 657ms 10ms codon 0.16.2
codon 2.py 911ms 35ms 104.9MB 883ms 13ms codon 0.16.2
odin 2.odin 1175ms 2.5ms 6.4MB 1167ms 0ms odin 2023

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 122ms 0.7ms 11.3MB 110ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 150ms 1.1ms 15.1MB 140ms 0ms codon 0.16.2
codon 2.py 202ms 0.9ms 25.6MB 183ms 7ms codon 0.16.2
odin 2.odin 290ms 0.5ms 2.5MB 280ms 0ms odin 2023