Codon VS Odin benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sun Jan 29 2023, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][2 cores] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8370C CPU @ 2.80GHz (Model 106)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 1.6ms 0.6ms 1.3MB 0ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 4.1ms 0.8ms 5.3MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.15.4

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1-i.odin 533ms 6.0ms 1.2MB 523ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 1947ms 23ms 5.3MB 1933ms 0ms codon 0.15.4
odin 1.odin 2879ms 0.3ms 1.3MB 2870ms 0ms odin 2023

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1-i.odin 55ms 0.6ms 1.3MB 43ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 197ms 0.8ms 5.3MB 187ms 0ms codon 0.15.4
odin 1.odin 292ms 3.4ms 1.2MB 280ms 0ms odin 2023

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 600ms 8.2ms 40.6MB 573ms 10ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 873ms 79ms 48.3MB 850ms 3ms codon 0.15.4
codon 2.py 1003ms 24ms 106.7MB 977ms 13ms codon 0.15.4
odin 2.odin 1181ms 0.7ms 6.4MB 1167ms 0ms odin 2023

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
odin 1.odin 123ms 3.7ms 11.4MB 107ms 0ms odin 2023
codon 1.py 150ms 0.2ms 15.1MB 133ms 3ms codon 0.15.4
codon 2.py 185ms 3.8ms 23.9MB 173ms 3ms codon 0.15.4
odin 2.odin 290ms 3.0ms 2.6MB 280ms 0ms odin 2023