Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

Codon VS Dart benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sun Jan 29 2023, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][2 cores] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8370C CPU @ 2.80GHz (Model 106)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 4.1ms 0.8ms 5.3MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.15.4
dart 1.dart 7.3ms 0.7ms 13.8MB 0ms 0ms dart/exe 2.19.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
dart 3.dart 530ms 5.0ms 13.5MB 517ms 0ms dart/exe 2.19.0
codon 1.py 1947ms 23ms 5.3MB 1933ms 0ms codon 0.15.4

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
dart 3.dart 62ms 1.3ms 14.2MB 50ms 0ms dart/exe 2.19.0
codon 1.py 197ms 0.8ms 5.3MB 187ms 0ms codon 0.15.4

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 873ms 79ms 48.3MB 850ms 3ms codon 0.15.4
codon 2.py 1003ms 24ms 106.7MB 977ms 13ms codon 0.15.4

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 150ms 0.2ms 15.1MB 133ms 3ms codon 0.15.4
codon 2.py 185ms 3.8ms 23.9MB 173ms 3ms codon 0.15.4