Codon VS OCaml benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Wed Jan 22 2025, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 1.9ms 0.2ms 5.0MB 0ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 1.py 4.1ms 0.5ms 5.5MB 0ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 373ms 4.8ms 5.3MB 363ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 1.py 1371ms 99ms 7.9MB 1357ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
ocaml 1.ml 40ms 0.1ms 5.3MB 30ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 1.py 135ms 1.9ms 7.9MB 123ms 0ms codon 0.17.0

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 368ms 5.0ms 46.5MB 357ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
codon 2.py 848ms 3.7ms 100.0MB 830ms 13ms codon 0.17.0
ocaml 1.ml 914ms 6.3ms 552.5MB 853ms 43ms ocaml 5.3.0
ocaml 2.ml 1875ms 8.7ms 18.6MB 1857ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
codon 1.py 71ms 1.3ms 15.3MB 60ms 0ms codon 0.17.0
ocaml 1.ml 176ms 3.5ms 142.3MB 153ms 7ms ocaml 5.3.0
codon 2.py 198ms 1.5ms 25.9MB 187ms 3ms codon 0.17.0
ocaml 2.ml 466ms 4.9ms 9.1MB 453ms 0ms ocaml 5.3.0