Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

Acton VS D benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Sat Nov 16 2024, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][4 cores] AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor (Model 1)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

edigits

Input: 250001

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
acton 1.act 263ms 9.9ms 7.1MB 227ms 70ms actonc 0.24.1
d 1.d 2539ms 2.5ms 8.1MB 2530ms 0ms ldc2 1.39.0
d 1.d 2922ms 4.0ms 10.3MB 2913ms 3ms dmd 2.109.1

Input: 100000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
acton 1.act 95ms 8.4ms 5.5MB 70ms 30ms actonc 0.24.1
d 1.d 441ms 1.2ms 7.9MB 430ms 0ms ldc2 1.39.0
d 1.d 535ms 5.9ms 10.1MB 523ms 0ms dmd 2.109.1

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
d 1.d 1.7ms 0.2ms 2.9MB 0ms 0ms ldc2 1.39.0
d 1.d 2.3ms 0.3ms 5.1MB 0ms 0ms dmd 2.109.1
acton 1.act 4.3ms 0.4ms 8.0MB 0ms 0ms actonc 0.24.1

pidigits

Input: 8000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
d 1.d 2410ms 8.4ms 8.0MB 2367ms 387ms ldc2 1.39.0
acton 1-m.act 3110ms 78ms 6.7MB 2773ms 2133ms actonc 0.24.1
d 1.d 4352ms 6.4ms 10.1MB 4243ms 487ms dmd 2.109.1

Input: 4000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
d 1.d 578ms 1.6ms 8.1MB 557ms 93ms ldc2 1.39.0
acton 1-m.act 932ms 61ms 5.7MB 810ms 600ms actonc 0.24.1
d 1.d 1041ms 11ms 10.2MB 1027ms 113ms dmd 2.109.1