Programming Language and compiler
Benchmarks

Julia VS Crystal benchmarks

Current benchmark data was generated on Thu Jul 13 2023, full log can be found HERE

CONTRIBUTIONS are WELCOME!

[x86_64][2 cores] Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8370C CPU @ 2.80GHz (Model 106)

* -m in a file name stands for multi-threading or multi-processing

* -i in a file name stands for direct intrinsics usage. (Usage of simd intrinsics via libraries is not counted)

* -ffi in a file name stands for non-stdlib FFI usage

* (You may find time < time(user) + time(sys) for some non-parallelized programs, the overhead is from GC or JIT compiler, which are allowed to take advantage of multi-cores as that's more close to real-world scenarios.)

helloworld

Input: QwQ

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 1.cr 2.3ms 0.5ms 3.0MB 0ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
julia 1.jl 200ms 0.6ms 216.9MB 112ms 76ms julia/aot 1.9.2

nbody

Input: 5000000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 2.cr 450ms 0.3ms 2.9MB 437ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
crystal 1.cr 468ms 29ms 3.0MB 457ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
julia 7.jl 600ms 25ms 223.1MB 523ms 63ms julia/aot 1.9.2

Input: 500000

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 2.cr 48ms 0.1ms 2.9MB 40ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
crystal 1.cr 48ms 0.8ms 3.0MB 40ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
julia 7.jl 281ms 4.9ms 223.1MB 193ms 73ms julia/aot 1.9.2

nsieve

Input: 12

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
julia 1.jl 441ms 3.7ms 206.9MB 367ms 60ms julia/aot 1.9.2
crystal 2.cr 458ms 6.2ms 8.0MB 443ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
crystal 1.cr 604ms 9.8ms 42.6MB 583ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0

Input: 10

lang code time stddev peak-mem mem time(user) time(sys) compiler compiler/runtime
crystal 2.cr 103ms 0.3ms 4.1MB 90ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
crystal 1.cr 140ms 4.1ms 13.0MB 127ms 0ms crystal 1.9.0
julia 1.jl 236ms 5.2ms 200.7MB 150ms 70ms julia/aot 1.9.2